• Purpose of This Blog and Information about the Author

Latticework Wealth Management, LLC

~ Information for Individual Investors

Latticework Wealth Management, LLC

Monthly Archives: October 2013

You Purchased a Stock: Now What?

27 Sunday Oct 2013

Posted by wmosconi in asset allocation, Bernanke, bonds, business, Charlie Munger, Education, Fed, Fed Taper, Fed Tapering, Federal Reserve, finance, financial planning, Individual Investing, interest rates, investing, investing, investments, stocks, bonds, asset allocation, portfolio, investments, math, Modern Portfolio Theory, MPT, personal finance, portfolio, risk, statistics, stock prices, stocks, volatility, Warren Buffett, Yellen

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

$WU, asset allocation, bonds, business, Charlie Munger, equity, equity selection, finance, individual stocks, investing, investments, momentum stocks, portfolio, stock pickers market, stockpicking, stocks, value investing, Value Masters, Warren Buffett, Western Union

One of the questions that I have been asked is about individual stocks, and, more specifically, how to monitor developments after the purchase.  Now I have mentioned before that I strongly recommend that you do not start off trying to buy individual stocks.  ETFs and index mutual funds are a better way to start off investing and will generally garner you higher returns in the long-run.  Why?  Well, please continue reading, and you will see how I approach the decision to purchase a stock and when I decide to sell.  Now my method is strictly my own, but you will see it closely mirrors Warren Buffett’s style of investing.  There are many other market participants that use a variation of the Buffett and Graham paradigm.  Moreover, there are literally tens of thousands of portfolio managers, hedge fund investors, research analysts, and others that value stocks every second of every day in response to company, economic, and geopolitical news.  Once you see how much work it takes, I am hopeful that you do NOT try it to begin with.

Before delving into the process of following a stock after your purchase, I will go through the steps I take prior to a purchase.  I strive for a turnover of 15-20%.  Turnover measures how long an investor holds a particular stock.  A turnover of 100% means that an investor holds a stock for one year.  Thus, my turnover equates to a holding period of 5.0 to 7.5 years.  So if I am willing to hold a stock for that long, I better make sure I am confident that it is a good investment.  How do I start?  I have a list of stocks that I am interested in purchasing.  If I decide to possibly invest, I go through a lengthy process.  Now I am not recommending any security.  However, I want to put some meat surrounding the discussion.  Therefore, I will talk about my process in terms of my decision to purchase Western Union (WU).  Western Union is now my top holding.  Should you buy WU?  Maybe so.  Maybe not.  You must do your own homework and not take my word for it.  As a show of good faith, I encourage you to look at my Twitter account:  @NelsonThought.  I have been posting information about WU for several months, so I am not “cherry-picking” to make me look good.  Let’s begin.

Regardless of where I get my ideas of stocks to analyze, I start off my analysis by learning everything I can possibly get my hands on.  You would be amazed at how much information is out there.  Prior to deciding to even value WU, I took a number of steps.  First, I read the last three annual reports for WU.  What do I focus on?  The most important part of any annual report is a section called Management Discussion & Analysis (MD&A).  MD&A is indispensable because management has a chance to be open and honest with investors.  Now when you purchase a stock, you should view yourself as a fractional owner in the actual company.  You do not own a piece of paper that says you have x number of shares.  You own a claim to the future cash flows and dividends of that firm.  Contained within the MD&A is management’s discussion is a review of the most recent financial developments, their strategy, and what management thinks is the future direction of the company.  WU’s management team talks a great deal about emerging markets.  WU relies upon the wiring of money between individuals.  The most important, growing income stream comes from immigrants sending money back home to their families.  For example, did you know that 30% of the Gross Domestic Product of El Salvador comes in the form of these remittances?  Wow!  That fact always gets to me.  Obviously you can see that the emerging markets are a great way for WU to grow earnings.  Additionally, WU has a huge market share in the correctional system.  If family members or loved ones of prison inmates need money to purchase items behind bars, they can use WU to transfer money into their accounts to buy food, hygiene products, and even other items like TVs and radios.  WU’s management speaks at length about these opportunities, and they also focus on growing their network of facilities that provide their services.  There is a “network effect” for WU.  The more money transfer centers there are, the more people in general will use their services.  For instance, if a local WU outlet is right near your house, and you need to wire some money to an individual or business, you are more likely to use it.  Well, if you need to wire money to a friend, and the nearest WU outlet is 50 miles from that person, WU is probably not a good option for you.  Therefore, it makes sense for WU to provide good incentives to build up their network.

Now I really focus on MD&A going back in time because management is telling you what they intend to do in the future.  Think about it in these terms.  Have you ever had a friend who tells you that they are going to quit working and start a business?  I know that I have.  More often than not, when I see that person in several years, they tell me that they are still working but they are starting the business soon or they found a better business to start.  It is great to have ideas, but, unless you act upon them and do it, there really is no point.  Well, the same scenario happens very often with a business.  Management might describe great plans to grow the business back in 2010.  If they never speak about it again, or they have new and better ideas when you read the 2012 annual report, that should be a red flag for you.  Now changing strategy is sometimes warranted, but management should be transparent with you.  If a strategy is no longer relevant, or it did not work out, they should explain why.  It is only fair.  You own the stock; you own part of the company.  Always take the time to compare prior MD&A with current MD&A.  This technique can save you a lot of time.  Why value a stock if management does not seem to know what they are doing?

After you feel comfortable with management and still have strong beliefs that the business is well-positioned, you can look at the financial statements of the company.  Every publicly traded company is required to file financial statements with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  The reports are called 10-Ks on an annual basis and 10-Qs on a quarterly basis.  The SEC even has a website that you can go to when you look for them.  It is called the EDGAR system can be found here:  http://www.sec.gov/edgar.shtml.  The financial statements will include the income statement, balance sheet, and statement of cash flows.  Which part is most important to me?  Well, that is a trick question.  I go to the back of the financial statements and look at the notes to the financial statements.  Do not feel bad if you got the question wrong.  When I pose the question to undergraduate students during presentations that I give, I have never had a finance student give the correct answer.

 Why do I say the notes?  For one, I have an accounting undergraduate degree, so I am interested in them.  You can always get financial statement ratios and earnings expectations online, but they rarely incorporate information from the notes.  Now the notes to the financial statements tend to be boilerplate to begin with.  The accounting firm that audits the financial statements of a firm will explain that the company used generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) and disclose the accounting methodology utilized when GAAP allows different choices.  After all these disclosures, you will find lesser known items.  The second reason why I look at the notes to the financial statements is to see if there is something I do not understand.  What do I mean by this?  You may remember the downfall of Enron.  The downfall of Enron was right in plain sight all along.  Enron had a disclosure “buried” in the notes that talked about Special Purpose Vehicles (SPVs).  What is a SPV?  I still really have a vague understanding, but here are the basics without getting too technical.  A SPV is a separate legal entity that is set up to own assets and incur liabilities.  It is really like a subsidiary of a company but, since it is a separate entity, the assets and liabilities of the SPV are not required to be reported on the company’s balance sheet.  What?  This phenomenon is called off-balance sheet reporting.  Essentially it is a way to not disclose liabilities.  Think about it in terms of the federal government.  The federal government does not consider future Social Security and Medicare benefits to be necessary to be reported in the current budget.  Thus, the $50+ billion of future payments of benefits is not reported; only think tanks talk about it periodically.  Now I do not want this to be a political discussion.  That is not my intent.  I simply bring it to your attention as a more familiar example of this topic.  Thus, Enron had liabilities that it had to repay in the future, but, if you only examined the financial statements, the future payments were not on the balance sheet.  The auditors did not look too closely.  Why?  I liken it to this.  No one wanted to raise his/her hand and say what is this SPV thing.  In general and in business, people do not want to look uninformed or “dumb”.  If you see something in the notes to the financial statements that you do not understand, I would suggest that you pass on the purchase of that stock.  When I look at the notes for WU, there is nothing that bothers me in particular.

After I look at the notes, I focus on the statement of cash flows, balance sheet, and then the income statement.  I look at them in that exact order.  Now I do not prepare a model at this point to value the company.  Rather, I do some calculations in my head.  Is the company actually generating cash from the operations of the business?  Does the company have enough assets to invest in the business?  Are earnings coming from sources that will either never occur again or have nothing to do with its core business?  These are very vital questions to ponder.  Why do you not value the company at this point?  Now I really have a number in mind for what the stock is worth, you still need to compare that to the sub-industry and industry that the company operates within.

As one reader commented, he was probably going to use this discussion to cure his insomnia ailment.  Hopefully you made it this far.  Are we having fun yet?  I promise we will get to the discussion of how to follow a stock after making a purchase, but I need to lay the foundation to ensure that my method makes sense.  Not that it is right, but the logic of the paradigm is plausible.  As it relates to the sub-industry and industry, I perform what is referred to as a SWOT analysis.  SWOT stands for Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats.  Now I already know the S and W part from my review of MD&A and the review of the financial statements issued by the company.  The O and the T refer to the industry and competitors.  The main competitors in this space to WU are MoneyGram International and Euronet Worldwide.  How does WU match up against these two?  These two companies are smaller than WU, but bigger is not always better.  These two firms are constantly innovating and trying to make inroads into the niche of WU.  They are referred to as firms within the sub-industry.  The industry as a whole is the financial services industry.  Now WU is able to grow significantly in the emerging markets because the banking industry is not very developed in these countries.  It is easier at this point to simply pick up a wire transfer at a Western Union outlet than to open a checking accounting.  I can assure you that banks have noticed taking note.  Banks are trying to come up with ways to make it easier to open an account and simply have the money deposited there.  That is the most common way to look at the industry.  Now sometimes it is easier to ignore other developments, but I try to take everything into account.  Did you know that you can make wire transfers at most Wal-Mart stores now?  That development might be a game-changer.  Think about it this way.  Why should you go to WU when you can simply do your normal shopping at Wal-Mart and then send your wire transfer?  Remember that there are a plethora of Wal-Mart stores, so they already have a built in “network effect”.  They are a definite competitor even though they are technically in the retail industry.

After my entire analysis, I was confident that the purchase of WU would be a good investment.  How do I go about valuing any stock?  As I mentioned previously, I use a method that Warren Buffett has perfected over the years.  Trust me, I am no Warren Buffett.  If I were as good as Warren Buffett, I would not be writing this blog.  However, his method (coupled with Phil Fisher, David Dodd, Charlie Munger, Bill Ruane, and a few others) makes sense to me.  Think about stocks like bonds.  Bonds are much easier to value.  Why?  They are a promise to pay back money loaned to them.  The only return from a bond held to maturity comes from the coupon.  The coupon is simply the interest rate.  As an aside, you will hear coupon over and over again.  Where does the term come from?  Back in the older days, when you would purchase a bond, the company would give you a certificate that actually had coupons.  When a payment was due from the company, you would take the coupon to your local bank and get your money.  The bank would collect all the coupons and present them directly to the company.  This was prior to the introduction of computer systems to monitor who owned which bond.  That is why you will hear the term coupon.  Anyway, the interest rate of the bond does not vary over time.  A bond is worth a set amount that you will receive upon maturity and the periodic interest payments, but you need to remember that the payment is fixed.  What if interest rates fall?  If you purchased a bond that had a 6% coupon and the prevailing interest rate for the same type of bond rises to 8%, how are you able to sell the bond?  Why would I buy your bond if I can simply buy one with an 8% coupon?  You can sell me that bond by lowering the price.  A corporate bond is usually issued in $1,000 increments, so, if interest rates rise, you can simply lower the price to make its return equivalent to owning an 8% percent bond.  This is what is referred to as an inverse relationship.  It works the same way in reverse if interest rates fall.  If prevailing interest rates fall to 4%, you can afford to charge what is referred to as a premium because buyers in the marketplace cannot find a better opportunity with your 6% coupon.  Therefore, you can charge more than $1,000.  How does this relate to stocks?  Stocks are nothing more than bonds with variable cash flows.  Now if you ignore the fact that owning a bond makes you a creditor and holding a stock makes you an owner of the firm, you really need to value it in the same way.  However, it is infinitely more difficult.  Why?  You do not know how the company will fare in the long-term.  Will the strategies work out, will they be executed properly, will another competitor overtake the company, or will a new technology displace the service provided by the company?  I have already talked about the competitors of WU, banks knocking at the door, and the “invasion” of Wal-Mart into the space.  All of these elements cause the future earnings of WU to be unknown and variable.  I am still confident with the prospects of WU, so I move to valuing the company and approach it in the same manner as I would a bond.

To me (and many others), a stock is only worth what a company can earn in the future.  If you have a friend that has a business idea but you can see that it is unlikely to work, would you invest in the firm?  Probably not.  When I look at WU, I see that it is likely to earn money far into the future.  What are earnings?  You will hear many different terms because there are many different types of market participants and other stakeholders.  I focus on a concept called owner earnings.  Owner earnings are a combination of Free Cash Flow (FCF) and changes in Plant, Property, and Equipment (PP&E) and working capital.  FCF is simply the cash that comes from ongoing operations of the firm.  However, you need to remember that the firm needs to make future investments in technology and other items.  Thus, when you look at depreciation of PP&E which is only an accounting convention, the company may need to make more or less investments into the business in order to keep competing.  Additionally, the company needs cash to simply pay current bills that come due which relates to working capital.  If you calculate FCF and adjust for PP&E additions and working capital, you come up with owner earnings.  Once you calculate owner earnings, you know that the firm will be able to grow owner earnings over time.  If they cannot grow owner earners in the future, you probably would not be at this point in the analysis right now.  Well, you also need to remember that these earning will occur in the future.  Why is this important?  Think about loaning $100 to a friend for a year.  If he/she tells you that they will pay you the $100 back sometime next year, you will most likely want more than $100.  For one, you automatically know that under normal economic conditions, it will cost more than $100 to buy the same amount of products or services next year.  Additionally, you could have bought something else with the $100 and enjoyed it right away.  This is the concept of utility.  For example, you could have purchased 5 or 6 Blu-Ray discs and enjoyed watching these movies.  You are forgoing that consumption because you loaned out the money.  In order to make it worth your while, you might tell your friend that you will loan him/her $100, but you want them to pay you $110 next year.  This will compensate you for inflation and delaying your consumption.  The same economic principle applies to the purchase of stocks.  You could spend your money, or you could invest in another stock.  Therefore, you will only purchase a stock if the price will increase satisfactorily in the future such that you can make money.  You need to discount these future owner earnings.

How do you discount the owner earnings?  I come up with my financial model at this point.  I determine how much WU will earn over the next five years, the five years after that, and then for the rest of its existence.  Once you have calculated the next five years, you need to remember something.  If a certain company is earning what is referred to as “excess profits”, other firms will come into the market and try to do the same thing because it is lucrative.   Additionally, there might be other technological advances which make the wire transfer business of WU less attractive or obsolete, which is even worse.  Thus, I assume that WU will grow at a certain rate for five years, a lower rate for the next five years, and then a growth rate similar to the general economy forever.  The last part is somewhat of a plug figure.  Most stock analysts will say that WU (or any other company) cannot keep growing at high rates forever, it will eventually grow owner earnings very similar to GDP growth in perpetuity.  Now I use an assumed growth rate of 3.5% which is higher than the domestic economy because WU has a significant presence in the emerging markets which are growing at a faster clip.  Now that I have a stream of owner earnings, I need to discount them to the present.  The discount rate is a subject of much debate.  I use a rate of 7% or the equivalent of the yield on the 10-year US Treasury.  Other investors will use a higher rate.  I won’t get into a debate about the proper discount rate to use.  I simply follow the advice of Warren Buffett.  Here is a link to see his rationale:  http://www.sherlockinvesting.com/help/faq.htm.  If I discount that owner income stream back to the present at that discount rate, I come up with what is referred to as an intrinsic value.  Intrinsic value is a concept that was coined and explained at length by the father of value investing, Benjamin Graham.  The intrinsic value is what I think WU is worth right now given the current business environment and likely future prospect.  Now since I am fallible and the future is uncertain, I use the margin of safety concept also introduced by Benjamin Graham.  I take the intrinsic value figure and reduce it by a certain amount.  For WU, since it is in a somewhat stable industry and finance is my background, I use a margin of safety of 20%.  Therefore, I multiply my intrinsic value figure by 80% (100%-20%).  If the current stock price of WU is lower than my calculation, I am inclined to buy.  The intrinsic value I get for WU is significantly above the current stock price.  I purchased WU at $14.24 average cost, and it now trades at $18.36 as of August 9, 2013.  I still hold the largest portion of my portfolio in WU because I see the intrinsic value of WU as being higher than that presently.

As you might imagine, this entire process took me roughly 55-60 hours.  Surprisingly, there are many stock analysts that may say that I was not thorough enough.  An example would be the famed hedge fund investor Bill Ackman.  I am willing to bet that I spent more time prior to the purchase of WU than you will spend on financial planning over the course of your lifetime.  I do not mean this in a condescending manner.  I only point this out to simply show why the purchase of an individual stock is not right for everyone.  I tend to refer to myself as a “dork”.  I am passionate about investing, and I love to perform this type of analysis and calculations.  If you are not willing to put in that type of time to do your homework, I would stop at this point.  I will repeat again that ETFs and index mutual funds are much better choices for individual investors.  If you would like the chance to beat the index averages, I would rather see you invest in actively managed mutual funds or separate accounts than try your hand at selecting individual securities.  With that being said, I will now turn to what I promised to in the beginning.  Please forgive me for what might seem to be a circuitous route.

I intend to hold WU for a long time.  I have a set intrinsic value, and I am willing to stick to holding the stock through all the “visiccitudes and vagaries” of the stock market.  My emotional intelligence is higher than most investors.  I view investing as an intellectual exercise.  The money is secondary.  As soon as you start focusing on the money, you may be tempted to sell your stock if it falls in price significantly for what might seem like no apparent reason.  If I need to wait for 5-10 years for WU to reach its intrinsic value, I am willing to do so.  Does this sound like fun?  Well, it is to me.  Unfortunately, this has really nothing to do with what you read in most financial news publications or see on financial media.  However, you need to remember that I am an investor in the company and not trading pieces of paper.  I can confidently say that the way investing is portrayed in the financial media is much more akin to speculation.  My suggestion is to go to the casino if you want to try to double your money.  You will have more fun.  Investing in stocks to gain significant riches immediately is a fool’s game in my opinion.

What do I focus on after the purchase?  The first thing I do is to read all the earnings transcripts of the firm.  After each quarter, the company will file a 10-Q with the SEC and announce financial results to the public.  Management will then talk to analysts on an earnings call to recap the quarter and then answer questions from a selected group of research analysts.  I try to see if the earnings results match up with MD&A and if management uses any “excuses”.  An example of a typical excuse is the weather.  If a retail outlet has depressed earnings, they tend to use bad weather as an excuse at times.  It may be likely, but, more often than not, it is a way to hide poor execution by management.  Any particular quarter should not affect your intrinsic value calculation much.  In the short-term, there can be developments that affect earnings for a temporary time.  I do not worry about quarterly earnings, but I am interested in how the company is doing.

The second thing I do is to keep up with general economic conditions.  I visit the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) website on a periodic basis.  The link is as follows:  http://www.bls.gov/.  The BLS is the agency of the government that monitors and releases economic statistics like GDP growth, new housing starts, the trade deficit, and a lengthy amount of others.  I focus on leading indicators, but I also am interested in the so-called lagging and coincident indicators released by the BLS.  Why do I pay attention to this?  I do so for one primary reason.  I am very confident in my calculations of future owner earnings for WU.  However, I usually extend that to include a three-part probability exercise.  For example, the likely path of owner earnings for WU is definitely affected by the current/future state of the economy.  I have a percentage for normal, boom, and bust scenarios.  The normal part gets the highest weight, and I then attribute different percentages to the other two.  Now I will admit that these are very subjective, but they are imperative.  How does the calculation work?  Well, I assume that WU will earn more money if the economy does better than expected or less money if the economy enters a recession.  Therefore, I multiply these scenarios by three different percentages.  For example, I currently weight my estimates of future owner earnings by 80% normal, 15% boom, and 5% bust.  Therefore, if the state of the economy changes or its future trajectory, I alter the percentages.  Since WU relies so much on remittances across borders, if global growth slows significantly, I need to weight the stream that assumes a recession much higher.  Using this approach, I do not have to recalculate owner earnings for WU again.  I simply use the three different scenarios and weight them differently.  Trust me, it saves a lot of time.

The next thing I do is to follow the developments of competitors.  I read the earnings transcripts of these firms, do a cursory review of financial statements, and look at how the industry is possibly changing (for better or for worse in terms of WU’s positioning).  It is extremely valuable to be constantly testing your investment thesis.  You need to be ready to admit that you made a mistake.  You can lose a lot of money otherwise.  I can attest to that via Best Buy (BBY) and Citigroup (C) stock holdings in the past.  With that being said though, you need to do that without referencing the case laid out by speculators.  If someone tells me that WU will have a bad third quarter, I really do not care.  I am willing to ride out stock price volatility because I know that WU is worth more than the current market price.  The advice from speculators relates to traders of stocks (owning pieces of paper) and not investors.

I also follow market developments.  Although I do read the Wall Street Journal and Financial Times, I try not to get too hung up on the current news of the day.  You can get in trouble that way by feeling itchy and pulling the proverbial trigger and selling in a panic.  I commented on this in more detail in a previous blog as it relates to the entire stock market.  The link is as follows:  https://latticeworkwealth.com/2013/08/04/todays-news-should-prompt-you-to-adjust-your-entire-investment-portfolio/.  I tend to put more weight in The Economist, Barron’s, Bloomberg Businessweek, and trade journals.  I even read a few publications that seem unrelated but can make all the difference.  One great source is the Harvard Business Review.  This magazine is technical and “heavy duty”, but it can be a great way to identify mistakes that WU management is making or how they are behind the curve when it relates to business strategy.  This information helps me to determine whether or not my calculation of future owner earnings is correct and will come to fruition.

My next technique is a little odd to some.  I have found that I can learn a great deal about investing from other disciplines.  In fact, I will devote an entire post to the name of my firm.  I use what Charlie Munger, whom I lovingly refer to as Warren Buffett’s sidekick, calls the latticework of mental models.  This approach is to acknowledge that ideas from other discipline are germane and pertain to investing.  A perfect example is psychology.  There has been an explosion of ideas in the disciplines of behavioral finance and behavioral economics.  These fields do not assume that market participants are rationale.  Humans have innate biases and make consistent mistakes.  As an investor, you can use this to your advantage.  The one adage along these lines comes from Warren Buffett:  “Be fearful when others are greedy and greedy when others are fearful”.  If everyone is telling me that WU is going to the moon, I start to question my investment thesis.  Now as a contrarian investor, if everyone is selling WU for reasons that are temporary or are related to general market selling, I perk up and even look to add to my position.  You can read more about the latticework of mental models in an excellent book by Robert Hagstrom called Latticework:  The New Investing.  I use the concept of complex adaptive systems from biology, and the concept of nature searching for equilibrium from physics all the time.  In fact, there is an entire website that you can learn a great deal from.  It is called the Sante Fe Institute.  This think tank is not devoted to investing at all, but they are looking for common themes among different disciplines.  Take a look; I promise you will not be disappointed:  http://www.santafe.edu/.  I now will turn to the little talked about decision to sell a stock.

I think about WU in these terms.  If I come across another investment opportunity that is better than WU, I will sell WU.  If management or the state of the economy changes, I will sell WU.  If you are in a tax-deferred account (401(k), 403(b), Roth IRA, etc), you do not need to worry about taxes.  However, my individual stocks are in a taxable account.  While taxes should not guide your sell decision, you must take them into account when deciding if another opportunity is truly better.  Why?  You should only care about terminal values.  If you sell WU and buy another stock, that purchase should increase the value of your portfolio in the future.  That makes sense intuitively.  However, your mind can play tricks on you.  What if I am expecting to earn 9% a year from WU and another stock comes along that I can earn 13%?  Should I sell WU and earn the 13%?  The answer is that it depends.  Here is a typical scenario.  Let’s say I now own $20,000 of WU and purchased WU with an original investment of $10,000.  Thus, I have a $10,000 capital gain that is now subject to a 20% capital gains tax.  If I decide to sell WU and receive $20,000, I have to pay $2,000 ($10,000 * 20%) to the federal government come tax time.  Let’s look at the scenario in terms of expected yearly results.  If I sell WU to earn 13% in another stock, I am really only investing $18,000.  If I decide to keep WU, I still earn the 9% and avoid a capital gains tax.  What happens at the end of the year?  If my scenario holds true, I will have $21,800 ($20,000 + $20,000 * 9%) in my brokerage account at the end of a year if I earn 9% from owning WU.  If I decide to sell WU and buy the other stock, I will have $ 20,340 ($18,000 + $18,000 * 9%).  Yes, I earned 13% on my new stock, but I have a lower amount in my brokerage account.  Why is this a common phenomenon?  Well, most people file their taxes and pay any capital gains tax from their checking account.  The money does not come out of the brokerage account directly.  Your net worth goes down overall, but your brokerage account “misleads” you into thinking you made a great selection because you earned an extra 4% by owning this other stock.  In fact, you would need to earn 21.1% in order to have $21,800 in my brokerage account by being able to pay the capital gains tax and then have the same terminal value as I would by simply holding WU and earning 9%.  If you ever wondered why Warren Buffett holds onto Coca-Cola (KO) and American Express (AXP), taxes factor in greatly.

Now for all of you readers that are not asleep, I appreciate you bearing with me.  As I mentioned before, investing is not meant to be fun or exciting.  It is only fun and exciting if you like the intellectual challenge.  For all of us “dorks”, we go through this analysis because it is truly fun to us.  For most people, they would much rather not spend 60 hours finding a stock to buy and then 20-25 hours per year following your stock after the purchase.  Luckily, you can own an ETF or index mutual fund and likely match my investment return in WU or even beat it over the long term.  For more information on the style of Warren Buffett, I refer you to the following series of books by Larry Hagstrom (mentioned him before):

1)       The Warren Buffett Way

2)       The Warren Buffett Portfolio

3)       The Essential Buffett

4)       Security Analysis by Benjamin Graham the sixth edition

You will note that my investing style is similar to Warren Buffett, but I have incorporated elements from other famous investors and from other disciplines.  I will never be another Warren Buffett.  However, I can strive to use a similar investing paradigm.  Hopefully this discussion was helpful in thinking about one possible way to monitor your stock purchases.  Yes, it is a great deal of work and time consuming.  You will have much better investment results though, if you know as much as you can about your stock.

Are Your Financial Advisor’s Fees Reasonable? Are You Actually Adding More Risk to Your Ability to Reach Your Long-Term Financial Goals? Here is a Unique Way to Look at What Clients Pay For

26 Saturday Oct 2013

Posted by wmosconi in asset allocation, bonds, business, Consumer Finance, finance, financial advisor fees, financial planning, Individual Investing, interest rates, investing, investments, math, Modern Portfolio Theory, personal finance, portfolio, reasonable financial advisor fees, statistics, stock prices, stocks, volatility

≈ 22 Comments

Tags

asset allocation, bonds, conflict of interest, finance, financial advisor fees, Financial Advisors, financial planning, FINRA, gross fees, investing, investment advisory, investment advisory fees, investments, net fees, performance, portfolio, reasonable financial advisory fees, retirement, stocks, total returns

More and more financial professionals are charging clients based upon assets under management (AUM).  A common fee is 1%.  The fee for a $1 million portfolio would be $10,000 ($1,000,000 * 1%). Now you have heard me talk about the importance of keeping fees as low as possible.  Essentially you are trying to maximize your investment returns each year.  If you have quite a few needs, a Financial Advisor usually can provide a number of different services and advice.  For example, you also may need assistance with legal and tax advice.  Additionally, you may have more complex financial planning needs.  Financial professionals will assist you with portfolio allocation always.  Now I am going to look at AUM fees in a way that you may not be familiar with.  I can tell you already that the financial services industry will not be happy or agree with this presentation.  However, my goal is to help you and provide you with an argument that may finally give you the impetus to manage your own investments or think seriously about working with a financial planner that charges fees on an hourly basis.

I also encourage you to read the Wall Street Journal’s Weekend edition for October 26, 2013.  On the bottom of the Business & Finance section, Jason Zweig discusses the many conflicts of interest that Financial Advisors have.  FINRA (a Self-Regulatory Organization comprised of all brokerage firms) issued a 22,000-word report about fees, conflicts, and compensation of Financial Advisors.  Oddly enough, the words “advice” and “investing” showed up less than 10 times.  The financial services industry is concerned about this matter, so you should definitely take note and learn much more about what you are actually paying for.

Example for Retirees:

I will start out with an example for retirees because they tend to be working with financial professionals already.  If you are retired and not independently wealthy, you are in the wealth distribution phase of your life.  There are some retirees that are permanently in the wealth preservation phase.  Wealth preservation simply means that an investor has enough money to live comfortably, but he/she does not need to deplete his/her investment portfolio.  Furthermore, this investor does not really try to increase the value of his or her investment portfolio.  A retiree in the wealth distribution phase of life is the most common example.  This investor is gradual depleting his/her investment portfolio to pay for living expenses on an annual basis.  Due to the fact that this person is not working anymore and, thus has no income from work, and longevity keeps getting longer, he/she needs have an investment portfolio that is somewhat conservative in nature.  Therefore, it is not reasonable to expect to earn 8% per year.  A more common target return might be 5.5-6.0%.  If you are working with a financial professional who charges you 1.0%, you need to earn 6.5-7.0% on a gross basis in order to get to that target net return.  Now the long-term historical average of stocks is about 8.0%, so the higher your AUM fees are, the more weighting you will need to have in stocks and away from bonds and cash.  Well, we have already gone over that, and most individuals that present information will stop there.  I want to take this even further though.

Let’s say you are a current retiree with $1 million that you are living off of in additional to Social Security income.  You have a target return of 5.5% to fund your desired retirement lifestyle, and your Financial Advisor charges you a 1.0% AUM fee.  Thus, you will need to earn a 6.5% return gross to reach your bogey.  Now I would like to put in the twist, and I want to do a thought experiment with you.  Your Financial Advisor will sit down with you and assess your risk tolerance and ensure that the investment recommendations made are not too aggressive for you.  If you cannot take too much volatility (fluctuation in asset prices up and down over the short term), your financial professional will reduce your exposure to equities.  Well, I like to present information using economic principles as well.  If you just retired and are 65, you have one option right away.  You can simply invest all your retirement money in 10-year Treasury notes issued by the Department of the Treasury.  Treasury notes are free to buy.  All you need to do is to participate in one of the Treasury auctions and put an indirect bid in.  What is an indirect bid?  An indirect bid is simply saying that you would like to buy a set dollar amount of notes, and you are willing to accept whatever the market interest rate set by the auction is.  What is the yield on the 10-year Treasury right now?  The 10-year Treasury closed at 2.51% on October 25, 2013.  When you go to a financial professional, he/she is selecting investments in lieu of you simply purchasing the 10-year Treasury.  Keep in mind that US Treasuries are among the safest investments in the world.  They are backed by the full faith and credit of the US government.  Stocks, bonds, real estate, gold, and other investment options all have an added degree of risk.  With the additional risk, there is a possibility for higher returns though.  How does this relate to your 1.0% AUM fee?

Think about it this way:  why are you paying your Financial Advisor?  You are paying him/her to select investments that can earn you more than simply buying a US Treasury bill, note, or bond.  As an investor, you do not want to just settle for that return in most cases.  With that being said though, you can just start out there and forget it.  You do not need to engage a Financial Advisor to simply buy a 10-year US Treasury note.  This means that you are paying the Financial Advisor to get you incremental returns.  In our example above for a retiree, your target investment return is 5.5%.  If you are able to earn 5.5% during the year, the incremental return is 2.99% (5.50%-2.51%).  Remember that you are paying the Financial Advisor 1.0% in an AUM fee.  Therefore, you are paying the Financial Advisor 1.0% of your assets in order to get you an extra 2.99% in investment returns.  Well, 1.0% is 33.4% of 2.99%.  Thus, you are essentially paying a fee of 33.4% in reality.  Now your financial professional would flip if the information was presented in this way.  He/she would say that it is flawed.  The mathematics cannot be argued with; however, I will admit that many folks in the financial services industry would disagree with this type of presentation.

Remember that you started out with $1 million.  You could have gone to the bank and gotten cash and hid it in a safe within your residence.  AUM fees are always presented by using your investment portfolio as the denominator.  In our example, your investment fee is 1.0% ($10,000 / $1,000,000).  I urge you to think about this though.  Does that really matter?  Of course, the fee you pay to your Financial Advisor will be calculated in this manner.  But what are you paying for in terms of incremental returns?  If you want to calculate what you are paying for (the value that your Financial Advisor provides), the reference to the starting balance in your brokerage account is really moot.  It is yours to begin with.  Therefore, it should be removed from the equation when trying to quantify the value your Financial Advisor provides in terms of investment returns on your portfolio.

Now remember that I said your target investment return was 5.5%.  The long-term historical average of stocks is approximately 8.0%.  If you choose to simply allocate only enough of your investment portfolio in stocks and the rest in cash to reach that 5.5% target, you will select an allocation of 68.8% stocks and 31.2% cash (5.5% = 68.8% * 8.0% + 31.2% * 0.0%).  Note that I am assuming that cash earns no interest at all and that you can select an ETF or index mutual fund to capture the long-term historical average for stocks.  Now your financial professional is working with you to select an investment portfolio that achieves the 5.5% target return, and their investment recommendations will be different than this hypothetical allocation.  With that being said, the hypothetical allocation achieves your target return with a simple choice of two assets (an ETF or index mutual fund and hard currency).  Keep in mind that you will normally have a portion of your portfolio allocated to fixed income.  The 10-Year US Treasury note is trading around 2.50% as of October 25, 2013.  If you allocate your portfolio to 60% stocks, 30% 10-Year, and 10% cash, your expected return would be 5.6%  (60% * 8.0% + 30% * 2.5% + 10% * 0.0%).

Whatever your Financial Advisor is charging you in terms of fees, you need to make that percentage more in your total return on a gross basis such that your net return equals your target return.  In our example above, the assumed AUM fee was 1.0%.  That investment fee means that you have to earn 6.5% on a gross basis because you need to pay your Financial Advisor 1.0% for his/her services.  After the fee is paid, the return on your portfolio would be 5.5% on a net basis.  If we keep the allocation at 30% 10-Year and 10% cash, how much weighting do stocks need to be in your portfolio to ensure that your overall returns is 5.5% after paying your AUM fee?  The answer is 72.7%.  Why?  The expected return of your portfolio is 6.5% (72.7% * 8.0% + 27.3% * 2.5% + 0.0% * 0.0%) before fees.  Given the average retiree’s risk tolerance at age 65 or older, most people do not desire to have a portfolio with 65% or larger allocated to stocks.  Plus, the historical, long-term average of stocks is just that.  It is an average and rarely is 8.0% in any given year.  For example the S&P 500 Index has not had a single down year since 2008.  The returns for 2009, 2010, 2011, and 2012 were 26.5%, 15.1%, 2.1%, and 16.0%, respectively.  The average return over that span was 14.9%.  As of September 30, 2013, the S&P 500 Index was up 19.8%.  Now I am by no means making a prediction for the remainder of 2013 or 2014 for that matter.  However, I wanted to drive home the fact that, if your Financial Advisor sets up your financial plan with the assumption that your stock allocation will earn 8.0% on average, any actual return lower than that estimate will cause you to not reach your target return.  What is the effect?  You will not be able to maintain the lifestyle you had planned on, even more so if there are negative returns experienced in stocks over the coming years.

Essential/Important Lesson:

Let’s look at the next five years starting in 2014.  A five-year period covers 2014-2018.  If you start out with $1,000,000 invested in stocks and plan on earning 8.0% per year, you are expecting to have $1,469,328 at the end of five years.  Let’s say that the return of stocks is actually only 4.0% per year over the next five years.  You will only have $1,216,653 as of December 31, 2018.  The difference is $252,675 less than you were expecting.  The analysis gets worse at this point though.  How can it get any worse?  Well, if you were planning on 8.0% returns from stocks per year, the next five-year period 2019-2023 needs an excess return to catch up.  Thus, if your starting point on January 1, 2014 is $1,000,000, your financial plan is set up to have $2,158,925 as of December 31, 2023.  If you are starting behind your estimate in 2019, the only way you can make up the difference is to have stocks earn 12.2% over that five-year period which is 4+% higher than the historical average.  As you can see underperformance can really hurt financial planning.  The extremely important point here is that a 1% AUM fee will cause you to be even further behind your goals.  Remember that the illustration above is gross returns.  You only care about net returns and what your terminal value is.  Terminal value is simply a fancy way to say how much money is actually in your brokerage account.

Example for Those Saving for Retirement:

For those of you that are saving for retirement, you should use a different bogey than the 10-year US Treasury.  If you are 35 years old, you can simply invest in the 30-year Treasury bond (the jargon on Wall Street is “the long bond”).  The closing yield on the 30-year Treasury on October 26, 2013 was 3.60%.  Thus, I would suggest that you use this benchmark to calculate your incremental return.  If your financial professional tells you that this analysis does not apply to you because you are 45 years old and your timeframe to retirement is 20 years, I would agree.  With that being said though, you can find the current yield on a US Treasury bond with 20 years to maturity.  Most people are familiar with the Treasury yields quoted in the financial media and on financial websites.  Those yields are calculated based upon on-the-run Treasuries.  On-the-run simply refers to the most recently Treasuries sold at auction.  Once the Department of the Treasury sells new bills, notes, or bonds, those last financial instruments are referred to as off-the-run.  Keep in mind that the off-the-run Treasuries still trade on the bond market.  You always can get a current yield for them.  It is harder to find, but it is available on the Internet.  You can find out more information directly on the Department of the Treasury’s website:  http://www.treasury.gov/resource-center/data-chart-center/interest-rates/Pages/yieldmethod.aspx if you wanted to learn about this concept in more detail.  I would never recommend using a bogey less than the 10-year Treasury note though even if you have fewer than 10 years to retirement.  The aforementioned analysis for the calculation of incremental returns and the value-added from your financial professional will apply as in the example for retirees.

I will admit that this is a novel way to look at fees on investment portfolios.  However, there are a number of financial professionals that are using this approach now.  Keep in mind that one of the hardest questions to answer is in regard to the measurement of how much value your Financial Advisor provides.  How do you know if he/she is doing a good job for you?  The more common approach is to look solely at investment returns and compare it to a standard index return(s).  This analysis is meant to supplement the discussion.  I am hoping that this presentation will give you added incentive to seriously consider managing your own investments.  Or at the very least maybe try to find a financial planner that charges an hourly fee or flat fee.  You can pay a financial planner an hourly fee to sit with you and decide if your life situation and the current state of the financial markets warrant a change to your portfolio allocation among asset classes.  That financial planner also can work with you on your emotional intelligence and the urge to sell all your stocks and/or bonds because of current negative news and events.

Of course, I will not dissuade you from seeing a Financial Advisor.  On the other hand, I encourage you to have them walk through the value that they provide for you.  What can he/she do for you that you cannot do for yourself by buying an index mutual fund and US Treasury notes absolutely free?  You can use this analysis as a template for your discussion.  Most financial services firms essentially bundle financial advice.  Even if you do not need legal, tax, and complicated financial planning advice, you are still paying for it.  Now it is nice to have it available to you at any given time, but, if you do not use it or never use it, do you really want to pay for it?  It is very difficult to find financial services firms that can separate out those higher level services and provide advice on portfolio allocation and distribution of income to supplement retirement income only.  The vast majority of investors do not need complex advice though.  For example, the current exemption for estate taxes is $5.25 million.  Thus, if you do not have a net worth more than this, estate planning will not be a major concern.  Furthermore, if you are not planning on setting up a charitable trust for giving, legal advice is not necessary either.  In terms of tax advice, most investors simply have to record capital gains and dividends.  There are some techniques to “harvest” capital losses to reduce capital gains, but that is pretty simple to do on your own.  In terms of sophisticated financial planning, most investors do not have life situations that necessitate the advice (e.g. providing for the long-term needs of a special needs child, concentrated wealth in a family-owned business, significant stock options, etc.).  If your financial services firm offers that advice and you do not use it, you cannot just tell your financial services firm that you do not want to pay for it.  There really is not an ala carte option.  You will pay your 1.0% (or whatever it may be) AUM fee.  The ironic thing is that, if you have a large enough investment portfolio where this advice comes into play, your AUM fee will almost certainly be significantly less than 1.0%.  Doesn’t this make you want to learn more about investments and if you can take more of an active role?  I sure hope so.

I welcome comments/feedback and constructive criticism.  If there are Financial Advisors that totally disagree with my logic and presentation, I would love to hear from you.  I can be contacted at latticeworkwealth@gmail.com.  As I mentioned in a previous post, I wanted to hear from you.  I appreciate the topics selected.  In my next few posts, I will devote some time to discussing the issues that were suggested by you.  I will get back to my normal selections in a week or so.

Are Your Investment Fees Higher Than Your Taxes? Probably.

22 Tuesday Oct 2013

Posted by wmosconi in business, Charity, Consumer Finance, Education, Fed Taper, Federal Income Taxes, finance, financial planning, Income Taxes, Individual Investing, interest rates, investing, investing, investments, stocks, bonds, asset allocation, portfolio, investments, math, NailedIt, personal finance, portfolio, risk, State Income Taxes, statistics, stocks, Uncategorized

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

Adjusted Gross Income, AGI, asset allocation, bonds, charity, disclosures, federal income taxes, fee-only, fee-only financial planning, Financial Advisors, financial planning, hidden fees, hidden financial fees, income taxes, investing, investment fees, investments, portfolio, reasonable investment fees, RIA, state income taxes, stocks, tax planner

There are two important ratios that most individuals do not pay enough attention to.  In fact, the financial services industry rarely, if ever, makes mention of them.  They are as follows:

–          The first ratio measures the amount of your investment fees paid versus the total federal, state, and local income taxes you pay.

–          The second ratio measures the amount of investment fees paid versus your total income.

Why are these two ratios so important?  First, they bring to your attention the absolute dollar amount of investment fees paid to your Financial Advisor, your brokerage firm, and other third parties.  Second, you will note that, although you cannot choose to ignore paying your income taxes, you can lower the total amount you spend on financial and investment advice.  Lastly, you can think about what other uses you might have for the money you spend currently on investment fees either in whole or in part.  Let’s talk briefly about how to calculate these ratios and then delve into their usage in more detail.

The ratios are fairly easy to calculate.  The first ratio is investment fees paid versus total federal, state, and local income taxes you pay.  Luckily, most people do not pay local income taxes, and several states have no income tax.  If you do have one or both of these taxes, you simply add the total taxes due together from all three sources.  Note there is a big difference between taxes paid and taxes due.  If you received a federal and/or state tax refund, you still paid taxes into the system.  A refund is simply an adjustment to ensure that you only pay your fair share according to the tax code.  You would add up the taxes due to federal, state, and local agencies on your income tax returns.  Your investment fees come directly from your brokerage statement(s).  The two most common expenses are asset under management (AUM) fees and commissions.  You would add up all the AUM fees and commissions charged to your over the course of the year.  The only other number you need is to take your Adjusted Gross Income (AGI) from your federal tax return.

As I have stated in previous posts, the most common AUM fee is 1%.  So let’s take a common scenario for retirees today.  For illustrative purposes, assume there is a retiree with a $1 million portfolio in a 401(k) account that withdraws $50,000 and is charged a 1% AUM fee.  The total AUM fee would be $10,000 for the year.  If the retiree also has Social Security income of $20,000, the second ratio would be 14.3% ($10,000 / ($50,000 + $20,000)).  What does that percentage mean?  The percentage shows you that your investment fees are equivalent to 14.3% of your annual income.  Now the total taxes paid by each individual will vary greatly.  However, the average taxpayer tends to pay around 10%-15% in federal and state income taxes.  In our assumed scenario above, the total income taxes due would be $7,000-$10,500.  The first ratio is either 142.9% ($10,000 / $7,000) or 95.2% ($10,000 / $10,500).  What does that percentage mean?  The percentage shows that in the higher tax situation you are paying essentially the same amount in income taxes as you are in investment fees.  The lower tax situation shows that your investment fees are 42.9% higher than your income taxes.  No matter which way you slice it, you are in a high “investment fee” bracket.  The investment fees you are paying are yet another drag on the net income you end up having for living expenses and for leisure activities.  To a great extent, your income taxes are fixed in any given year unless you have an unusual income stream occur.  Your investment fees are variable every single year.

Now I am not saying that you should no longer use a Financial Advisor or go to your investment firm.  Please do not mistake that as my message.  However, I am recommending that you calculate those two ratios to bring the investment fees to your attention.  You can then make the choice regarding whether or not you might want to seek out a fee-only or hourly Investment Advisor or Financial Planner.  Or you might want to investigate if you have the knowledge or can acquire the knowledge how to manage your own investments.  What would be the incentive of those two alternatives?  Obviously I am biased, but nothing like these stories inspire me more.  My parents are in the grouping that would be charged roughly $10,000 per year in investment fees.  They are lucky enough to not require a Financial Advisor to whom they would pay a 1% AUM fee or similar level.  I recently found out that they will be taking a two-week cruise in Europe next month for essentially that same amount.  My father is fine with the vacation because he knows my mother deserves a relaxing time after her recent (and successful) battle with breast cancer, and he has listened to my logic in terms of the “savings” that they have each year.  You might debate the term “savings”.  I simply use the term due to the fact that they are taking a cruise rather than paying a Financial Advisor and his/her firm.  It is the same choice that you have when it comes to how you would use your money, if you did not have to pay an AUM fee.

For many other people, the monies can be used to help family and charities while you are still alive.  For example, you could decide to pay $10,000 toward your grandchild’s college education or add money to your grandchildren’s’ 529 college savings plans.  Or, if you have 15 grandchildren, you might choose to buy all of them an iPad for the holidays.  Conversely, the charitable uses for the money are almost as endless as your imagination.  One particularly interesting idea with Thanksgiving coming around the corner is paying for dinners for disadvantaged families.  The average family spends roughly $50 for a Thanksgiving dinner each year.  That figure sounds quite low to me.  What if you gave 130 families $75 toward their Thanks giving dinner next year?  If you wanted to split the monies between your family and charity, you could buy 65 dinners instead.  Imagine being able to allow an entire square block of families be able to enjoy a great meal or how many more free Thanksgiving meals a homeless shelter could serve with $5,000.    The great thing about this new-found freedom is that you will avoid the $10,000 AUM fee the following year again.  You can choose to do the same thing the following year in whole or in part.  Why not choose to get to know two local families, sponsor them, and pay for their groceries for the entire year?

Note that there is nothing that says you cannot see a fee-only or hourly Investment Advisor or Financial Planner.  You might pay $250 per hour for four hours or a flat fee of $1,000 on an annual basis.  In that scenario, you would be saving $9,000 ($10,000 – $1,000).  Plus, there is another thing that retirees fail to realize most of the time.  There is no rule that says you have to keep all your money at one full service brokerage firm.  There are many individuals that maintain an account at a full service brokerage firm and have another account with most of their funds at a discount brokerage firm.  The full service brokerage firm will want you to transfer the funds over to them, but I worked for years preparing performance reports for high net worth clients.  Many of them had money at other firms, and we simply included that information as data points in a customized report that showed all their assets and returns of their portfolio.  If your firm balks at you moving monies from them and tells you they might drop your account, I would seriously consider why you are at that firm anyway.  You can ask your Financial Advisor what value he/she provides that necessitates your keeping all your assets there.  I would encourage you to show him/her your two ratios and use that to start the discussion.

There may be certain cases where it is difficult to find your investment fees.  If you are not paying any commissions or an AUM fee, I certainly assure you that your Financial Advisor is not managing your money for free and he/she a nice person.  You should ask what fees you are paying.  Did you pay a load to purchase a mutual fund?  What is the expense ratio of your mutual funds or variable annuities?  There is a multitude of ways to charge fees, and it is in the best interest of a financial services firm to not disclose each of them.  Now I will clarify here.  You will most certainly get a financial note that says you are charged x percent, but it is quite rare for that percent to be changed into an actual dollar amount for you to view.  For the aforementioned scenario above, the firm should say that your AUM fee is 1% which is equal to $10,000.  The latter figure is much more impactful.

What are good benchmarks for the ratios discussed above?  The first ratio measures your investment fees versus your total income taxes.  A ratio of 10%-15% is a great target.  The second ratio measures your investment fees versus your total income.  A target of 1%-3% is a great target.  If you are accustomed to dealing with a Financial Advisor, it is quite unlikely that your ratios will approach those levels.  However, as previously mentioned your investment fees are variable and can change.  Your Financial Advisor may make the argument that he/she is needed to ensure your income taxes are strategically planned.  Well, he/she should have been doing that all along, right?  Isn’t that one of the reasons why you are currently working with a Financial Advisor?  If you have a tax plan in place and are not expecting an unusual sum or source of income, the additional cost of having a Financial Advisor as a “tax expert” is usually not a good cost/benefit option.  Why?  Does it make sense to pay a Financial Advisor an extra $9,000 per year over a fee-only Investment Advisor to ensure you do not pay an extra $1,000 in income taxes?  The net cash flow for you is a decline of $8,000; remember you can always consult your tax accountant or financial planner for an hourly consultation whenever a tax situation comes up.  Furthermore, you can arrange to meet with either party for at least one hour per year to speak only about taxes.

Lastly, I strongly encourage each of you to open a checking account at a bank or credit union that you only use to pay investment fees and income taxes.  It is very easy to find a checking account that charges no monthly fee whatsoever, especially at a credit union in your area.  There may be cases where it is inadvisable to pay investment fee via a checking account.  Why?  Well, you would have to withdraw the money, pay federal and state income taxes, and then send the money to your financial services firm.  In that case, I would encourage you to pay your investment fee with a check from your home equity line of credit.  Most of the time, you will be paying 3-5% in interest on a home equity loan.  The tax-equivalent interest rate at today’s levels is approximately 1.95-3.75%.  In order to highlight the level of investment fees paid, it is well worth paying an additional $200 or so in interest on your home equity loan.

When It Comes to Your Investments, Are You Smarter than a 14 year-old?

12 Saturday Oct 2013

Posted by wmosconi in asset allocation, Bernanke, bonds, business, Charlie Munger, Consumer Finance, Education, Fed, Fed Taper, Fed Tapering, Federal Reserve, finance, financial planning, GIPS, GIPS2013, Individual Investing, interest rates, investing, investing, investments, stocks, bonds, asset allocation, portfolio, investments, math, Modern Portfolio Theory, MPT, NASDAQ, personal finance, portfolio, risk, statistics, stock prices, stocks, volatility, Warren Buffett, Yellen

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

Bernanke, bonds, books, budgeting, business, Charlie Munger, education, excellence, Fed, Fed taper, Fed Tapering, Federal Reserve, finance, financial planning, Govtshutdown, highered, intelligence, investing, investing books, investments, IQ, math, mathematics, retirement, Shutdown, statistics, stocks, success, thought leaders, thoughtleaders, Twitter, Twitter information, TwitterIPO, volatility, Warren Buffett, Yellen

That is a great question.  I will save you the suspense and give you the answer.  You are as smart as a 14 year-old when it comes to your knowledge of your investments.  What 14 year-old teenager am I referring to?  I am referring to myself.  I started investing when I was 13 back in November 1987.  (If you do the math, you can figure out how old I am).  After spending a year studying the financial markets, I had amassed quite a bit of understanding.  How does this relate to you?  Well, if you have been following my blog, I have not revealed any information that I did not already know by then.  Now my writing style has improved and I have incorporated innovations introduced after 1988, the topics I have written about are not that complicated.  Before you continue reading, I would like to state at the outset that I was not some sort of child prodigy when it came to finance.  I was good at math and retained what I learned.  I am no genius and have no delusions of grandeur.  As I sometimes tell my friends, “If I really knew what I was talking about, I would be running a $10 billion hedge fund”.

With that being said, you also have the good fortune of learning from approximately 25 years of mistakes in investing and misunderstanding about the financial markets and the impacts of exogenous and endogenous events.  I could go on and on about my mistakes; however, I will mention a few here.  First, I had the opportunity to invest in two shares of Berskshire Hathaway Class A (BRK.A) stock back in 1991 when it traded a little above $8,700 per share.  Of course, Berkshire Hathaway is the company run by the famous investor Warren Buffett.  As of August 5, 2013, BRK.A’s closing stock price was $177,300 or a bit over $350,000 if I would have purchased those two shares back in 1991.  Why did I miss out on this opportunity?  I did learn everything I could about Warren Buffett once my economics teacher talked about him and his investing paradigm.  It really made sense to me from the start.  Unfortunately, I pass up on purchasing the shares because I would only be able to own those two shares and one other mutual fund.  As a young man, I was hyped and yearning to pick a number of different investment choices.  Best Buy is one of the best performing stocks in the financial markets and trades over $30 now.  I purchased Best Buy about 7 years ago and paid $42.  I did sell quite some time ago, but I took a huge capital loss.     Second, I wrote a paper during my MBA program that talked about the risk management procedures of Citigroup.  As I look back on that paper written in 2005, it is curious to note that, besides AIG, Citigroup went through the pain of learning the limits of risk management and it had a bailout of epic proportions.  I guess my paper was not the best in retrospect.  Finally, I had a terrible habit of picking the current “hot hand”.  I tended to switch my mutual fund holding way too often when I was in my teens.  It was really attractive to calculate how much money I could earn in a mutual fund that made 20% per year.  Wow, I could double my money in less than four years!  As you always see now, past performance is not indicative of future returns.  I really ignored that statement and invested many times based upon hopes and extrapolation instead of rational thought.  My emotions got the best of me.

I did have quite a few wins along the way.  For example, I was invested in the famous Fidelity Magellan mutual fund when it was run by Peter Lynch.  Peter Lynch is a legend among mutual fund managers.  At one point in time, Fidelity Magellan had more assets than any other mutual fund in the country.  Oddly enough, that was its eventual downfall.  Another example would be that I was able to learn how to successfully manage my father’s 401(k) portfolio from 1988 to the present.  I have seen many bull and bear markets and never had his eventual retirement portfolio take a significant hit in terms of poor returns.  My experience investing over the last 25 years has shown me that there will be many times when the financial pundits say this time is different, new industries are going to blow away the Old Economy, or that news events should cause investors to reallocate investment portfolios dramatically.  Even though I have been investing for 25 years, there have been very few seminal financial market events, the global economy may be different but the laws of finance and economics still hold (or they eventually bring prices back to earth), and new industries tend to bring more innovation and tools for existing, mature industries.  An illustration would be the early Internet companies lost money and burned through enormous amounts of cash.  However, the technologies they introduced allowed existing businesses to use the Internet in unique ways to either generate additional revenue or improve productivity.  A direct example would be how airplanes revolutionized leisure and business travel, but the airlines have been a wealth-destroying industry.  On the other hand, there are a myriad of business that used the services of airlines.

My overall point is that if you take one hour per week for about four months, you will be able to get through the five books I recommended on investing.  Additionally, you can spend another 30 minutes looking at a few financial websites just to increase your knowledge of investment products, finance terms, and keep abreast of news in general.  As a reminder, the list of five books can be found here:  https://latticeworkwealth.com/2013/07/23/spend-20-hours-learning-about-investments-to-prepare-20-years-of-retirement-2/ .  As another reminder, some recommended financial websites can be found here:  https://latticeworkwealth.com/2013/08/04/todays-news-should-prompt-you-to-adjust-your-entire-investment-portfolio/ .

My entire goal with this blog is to save you lots of time.  Rather than being bombarded by disparate information regarding the financial markets and how to approach investing, I am trying to give you a shortcut.  I am hopeful that, if you have a roadmap that is clear, you will be more motivated to learn about investments and eventually become more comfortable with the process of building an investment portfolio to meet your financial goals, while ensuring that your emotions do not get the best of you.  At the end of the day, many individual investors pay fees to financial professionals to save themselves from enemy #1.  Who?  I mean that sometimes individual investors act rashly and keep buying and selling stocks and bonds at inopportune times just because a bad news event comes along or via peer pressure.  Remember that, if you have read all my previous posts, you are more than likely in the 90th percentile of individuals understanding of how the financial markets work.  Keep in mind there have not been that many posts to my blog, so I hope you realize that it is not as painful as you might have once thought learning about managing your investment portfolio and the financial markets is.

As an aside, please feel free to reach out to me if you have a recommendation for a topic I can discuss.  Please remember that this is a website geared toward individual investors who are novices or have not been investing for too long.   Thus, I am not looking to discuss how one might use ARIMA modeling to understand how macroeconomic variables affect the financial markets or individual stocks/bonds.  I appreciate you keeping it relatively simple.  With that being said, if enough people contact me in regard to one specific topic, I will definitely take a closer look.  Thank you in advance for your participation and time thinking about what would be more useful to you.  Furthermore, I am hoping that I cover topics that apply to everyone.  If the collective investment intelligence of the group steps up a few notches, I will cover the topic.  Please send me an email:  latticeworkwealth@gmail.com

A New Paradigm for Investing Available on Amazon.com

11 Friday Oct 2013

Posted by wmosconi in asset allocation, Bernanke, bonds, business, Charlie Munger, Consumer Finance, Education, Fed, Fed Taper, Fed Tapering, Federal Reserve, finance, financial planning, GIPS, GIPS2013, Individual Investing, interest rates, investing, investing, investments, stocks, bonds, asset allocation, portfolio, investments, math, Modern Portfolio Theory, MPT, NailedIt, NASDAQ, personal finance, portfolio, risk, statistics, stock prices, stocks, volatility, Warren Buffett, Yellen

≈ Leave a comment

Tags

academia, academics, asset allocation, Ben Graham, Bernanke, bloomberg, bonds, BRK, BRK.A, BRK.B, BRK/A, BRK/B, Buffett, cnbc, cnbcfastmoney, cnbcworld, consumer finance, David Dodd, economics, economy, Fed, Fed taper, Federal Reserve, finance, financial advice, Govtshutdown, individual investing, investing, investments, Jim Cramer, madmoney, math, mathematics, MBT, Modern Portfolio Theory, personal finance, portfolio, retirement, Shutdown, statistics, stocks, value investing, Warren Buffett, Yellen

I am happy to announce that I have published another book on Amazon.com.  The book is another installment in my A New Paradigm for Investing series.  In this particular book, I focus on the use of Modern Portfolio Theory (MPT) as the primary tool by Financial Advisors to recommend portfolio allocations.  The theory is over 50 years old, and most of its assumptions have been shown to be less and less useful.  I explore the reasons why in my text.  I have tried to write in such a manner that you do not need a degree in mathematics or statistics to understand its contents.  Futhermore, you do not need to know about the intricacies of MPT in order to follow my logic.  You would find the same information in a college textbook but in a condensed format.

Note that this book is available for download onto a Kindle.  Additionally, there is a Kindle app for iPhones and Android devices which is free to download.  Amazon.com prime members can borrow the book for FREE. I have provided a link below to make it easier.   My email address is latticeworkwealth@gmail.com should you have any questions/comments/feedback.

The book is:

1)      A New Paradigm for Investing:  Is Your Financial Advisor Creating Your Portfolio with a 50 Year-Old Theory?:

http://www.amazon.com/New-Paradigm-Investing-Financial-ebook/dp/B00FQQ0CKG/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1381520643&sr=1-1&keywords=a+New+paradigm+for+investing+by+William+Nelson

I would like to thank my international viewers as well.  I also wanted to especially thank some selected followers of my @NelsonThought and @LatticeworkWlth Twitter accounts (each of whom I would recommend following for the content and insight):

Followers on @NelsonThought:

The Wealth Report @wsjexperts – #wsjexperts

The Royce Funds @RoyceFunds

Research Magazine @Research_Mag

Barron’s Online @BarronsOnline

Vanguard FA @Vanguard_FA

Cleveland Fed Research @ClevFedResearch

Pedro da Costa @pdacosta

Muriel Siebert & Co. @SiebertCo

Roger Wohlner, CFP® @rwohlner

Ed Moldaver @emoldaver

Sylvia Maxfield @sylviamaxfield

The Shut Up Show @theshutupshow

Berni Xiong (shUNG) @BerniXiong

Followers on @LatticeworkWlth:

Euro-banks @EuroBanks

Direxion Alts @DirexionAlts

Charlie Wells @charliewwells

AbsoluteVerification @GIPStips

Investment Advisor @InvestAdvMag

Gary Oneil @GaryONeil2

MJ Gottlieb @MJGottlieb

Bob Burg @BobBurg

Melody Campbell @SmBizGuru

TheMichaelBrown @TheMichaelBrown

Phil Gerbyshak @PhilGerbyshak

MuniCredit @MuniCredit

D.J. Rob-Ski @DJRobSki

A New Paradigm for Investing Available on Amazon.com

06 Sunday Oct 2013

Posted by wmosconi in asset allocation, Bernanke, bonds, business, Charlie Munger, Consumer Finance, Education, Fed, Fed Taper, Fed Tapering, Federal Reserve, finance, financial planning, GIPS, GIPS2013, Individual Investing, interest rates, investing, investing, investments, stocks, bonds, asset allocation, portfolio, investments, math, NailedIt, NASDAQ, personal finance, portfolio, risk, statistics, stock prices, stocks, volatility, Warren Buffett, Yellen

≈ 1 Comment

Tags

asset allocation, bbc, bbcworld, bloomberg, bonds, budgeting, Buffett, Charlie Munger, cnbc, cnbcworld, consumer finance, economics, economist, Fed, Federal Reserve, Govtshutdown, investing, investments, Mungerisms, NailedIT, Naileditoftheday, NBCNightlyNews, personal finance, portfolio, retirement, Shutdown, stocks, theeconomist, Wall Street, Warren Buffett

I am happy to announce that I have published two books on Amazon.com that are available for download onto a Kindle.  Additionally, there is a Kindle app for iPhones and Android devices which is free to download.  Please feel free to check out the titles below.  I have provided links to make it easier.   The books explain how to select a Financial Advisor, and I provide a list of five books which can help you learn more about investing, respectively. I explain issues about investing as an individual in plain language and without the jargon normally associated with the financial markets. Please feel free to contact me should you have any questions/comments/feedback. My email address is latticeworkwealth@gmail.com.

The books are as follows:

1)      A New Paradigm for Investing:  Can Your Financial Advisor Answer These Questions?:

http://www.amazon.com/New-Paradigm-Investing-Financial-ebook/dp/B00F3BDTHW/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1381107823&sr=1-1&keywords=A+New+Paradigm+for+Investing+by+William+Nelson

2)       Spend 20 Hours Learning About Investing to Prepare for 20+ Years in Retirement

http://www.amazon.com/Learning-Investments-Prepare-Retirement-ebook/dp/B00F3KW9T2/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1379183661&sr=1-1&keywords=William+Nelson+Spend+20+Hours

The first book listed is normally $9.99 but available for a limited time at $7.99.  The other book is normally $2.99, but I dropped it down to $0.99 for the rest of October 2013.

I would like to thank my international viewers as well.  I also wanted to especially thank some selected followers of my @NelsonThought and @LatticeworkWlth Twitter accounts (each of whom I would recommend following for the content and insight):

Followers on @NelsonThought:

The Wealth Report @wsjexperts

The Royce Funds @RoyceFunds

Research Magazine @Research_Mag

Barron’s Online @BarronsOnline

Vanguard FA @Vanguard_FA

Cleveland Fed Research @ClevFedResearch

Pedro da Costa @pdacosta

Muriel Siebert & Co. @SiebertCo

Roger Wohlner, CFP® @rwohlner

Ed Moldaver @emoldaver

Sylvia Maxfield @sylviamaxfield

The Shut Up Show @theshutupshow

Berni Xiong (shUNG) @BerniXiong

Followers on @LatticeworkWlth:

Euro-banks @EuroBanks

Direxion Alts @DirexionAlts

Charlie Wells @charliewwells

AbsoluteVerification @GIPStips

Investment Advisor @InvestAdvMag

Gary Oneil @GaryONeil2

MJ Gottlieb @MJGottlieb

Bob Burg @BobBurg

Melody Campbell @SmBizGuru

TheMichaelBrown @TheMichaelBrown

Phil Gerbyshak @PhilGerbyshak

MuniCredit @MuniCredit

D.J. Rob-Ski @DJRobSki

Subscribe

  • Entries (RSS)
  • Comments (RSS)

Archives

  • January 2021
  • December 2020
  • November 2020
  • October 2020
  • January 2020
  • December 2019
  • November 2019
  • October 2019
  • September 2019
  • April 2017
  • July 2016
  • May 2016
  • March 2016
  • December 2015
  • November 2015
  • July 2015
  • June 2015
  • May 2015
  • August 2014
  • March 2014
  • February 2014
  • January 2014
  • December 2013
  • November 2013
  • October 2013
  • September 2013
  • August 2013
  • July 2013

Categories

  • academia
  • academics
  • active investing
  • active versus passive debate
  • after tax returns
  • Alan Greenspan
  • alpha
  • asset allocation
  • Average Returns
  • bank loans
  • behavioral finance
  • benchmarks
  • Bernanke
  • beta
  • Black Swan
  • blended benchmark
  • bond basics
  • bond market
  • Bond Mathematics
  • Bond Risks
  • bond yields
  • bonds
  • book deals
  • books
  • Brexit
  • Brexit Vote
  • bubbles
  • business
  • business books
  • CAPE
  • CAPE P/E Ratio
  • Charity
  • Charlie Munger
  • cnbc
  • college finance
  • confirmation bias
  • Consumer Finance
  • correlation
  • correlation coefficient
  • currency
  • Cyclically Adjusted Price Earnings Ratio
  • Dot Com Bubble
  • economics
  • Education
  • EM
  • emerging markets
  • Emotional Intelligence
  • enhanced indexing
  • EQ
  • EU
  • European Union
  • Fabozzi
  • Fama
  • Fed
  • Fed Taper
  • Fed Tapering
  • Federal Income Taxes
  • Federal Reserve
  • Fiduciary
  • finance
  • finance books
  • finance theory
  • financial advice
  • Financial Advisor
  • financial advisor fees
  • financial advisory fees
  • financial goals
  • financial markets
  • Financial Media
  • Financial News
  • financial planning
  • financial planning books
  • financial services industry
  • Fixed Income Mathematics
  • foreign currency
  • forex
  • Forward P/E Ratio
  • Frank Fabozzi
  • Free Book Promotion
  • fx
  • Geometric Returns
  • GIPS
  • GIPS2013
  • Greenspan
  • gross returns
  • historical returns
  • Income Taxes
  • Individual Investing
  • individual investors
  • interest rates
  • Internet Bubble
  • investing
  • investing advice
  • investing books
  • investing information
  • investing tips
  • investment advice
  • investment advisory fees
  • investment books
  • investments
  • Irrational Exuberance
  • LIBOR
  • market timing
  • Markowitz
  • math
  • MBS
  • Modern Portfolio Theory
  • MPT
  • NailedIt
  • NASDAQ
  • Nassim Taleb
  • Nobel Prize
  • Nobel Prize in Economics
  • P/E Ratio
  • passive investing
  • personal finance
  • portfolio
  • Post Brexit
  • PostBrexit
  • reasonable fees
  • reasonable fees for financial advisor
  • reasonable fees for investment advice
  • reasonable financial advisor fees
  • rebalancing
  • rebalancing investment portfolio
  • rising interest rate environment
  • rising interest rates
  • risk
  • risk tolerance
  • risks of bonds
  • risks of stocks
  • Robert Shiller
  • S&P 500
  • S&P 500 historical returns
  • S&P 500 Index
  • Schiller
  • Search for Yield
  • Sharpe
  • Shiller P/E Ratio
  • sigma
  • speculation
  • standard deviation
  • State Income Taxes
  • statistics
  • stock market
  • Stock Market Returns
  • Stock Market Valuation
  • stock prices
  • stocks
  • Suitability
  • Taleb
  • time series
  • time series data
  • types of bonds
  • Uncategorized
    • investing, investments, stocks, bonds, asset allocation, portfolio
  • Valuation
  • volatility
  • Warren Buffett
  • Yellen
  • yield
  • yield curve
  • yield curve inversion

Meta

  • Register
  • Log in

Blog at WordPress.com.